Don't Amazon Eat Industry

Reblogged from：

https://newonnetflix.org/dont-amazon-eat-industry

One of the greatest investors in Silicon Valley, Marc Andreessen, once famously said, "Software is eating the world." Now, he's doing it again with the Whole Foods acquisition. What will this mean for e-commerce and food in the future? While the full implications of this acquisition are unknown, many are worried about Amazon's potential to eat the world. Here are some things to think about. Andreessen was right.

Is Amazon eating Whole Foods?

The recent announcement from Amazon that it plans to acquire Whole Foods Market for $13.7 billion is a big deal for both companies. It represents the largest deal in the company's history and underscores Amazon's desire to break into the grocery business. Currently, only 1.2 percent of the U.S. grocery market is sold online, and Whole Foods has been caricatured as the company that gives you a "Whole Paycheck." This is a direct conflict with the mission of Amazon to keep its prices low.

While Whole Foods customers tend to be affluent, they often have to pay higher prices. This is why Amazon's purchase of Whole Foods may also benefit the company's own business model. In the future, Whole Foods will likely lower its prices in response to Amazon's acquisition. In addition, the company's Prime membership service may become a big advertisement for Whole Foods stores. In September, Cowen & Company estimated that 49 million Americans had signed up for Prime, which represented 44 percent of all households.

The company's leadership team is nearly all white, with no African-American or Asian-American employees. Even at the store level, the company is dominated by white men. Its global leadership team comprises 90% men and only 24% women. Furthermore, the company's stores are typically located in low-income communities, which may gentrify them. The company also has a history of exploiting people.

While Amazon's acquisition of Whole Foods is a great deal for consumers, it will also change the way the retail industry works in the U.S. by transforming the grocery experience. Amazon can redefine the perception of organic foods, create a new shopping experience for consumers, and merge online and offline purchasing. It will also enable Whole Foods to test different aspects of its business model, including online and offline store delivery.

One study showed that the price reductions were not enough to harm the company's bottom line. Amazon customers were spending twice as much as non-Prime members at Whole Foods. Amazon's reputation as a lower-priced grocery chain seems to be luring shoppers away from competitors. However, it remains to be seen how Amazon will take advantage of Whole Foods' newfound popularity and enticing shoppers.

The company's stock price has been down more than half as activist investors have asserted their ownership rights. According to reports, CEO John Mackey has been earning $1 a year since 2006. He now owns 980,000 shares of Whole Foods. The company is under pressure from investors to sell the company. However, the company has a plan to keep operating. If it succeeds, it will become a more popular grocery chain than ever before.

The acquisition of Whole Foods Market by Amazon is expected to be completed on Monday, August 28, 2017. Its new owners will provide the customers with lower prices for their favorite groceries. The new company will also introduce a Prime loyalty program to reward Prime customers, and will also install lockers at some stores. It's likely that Whole Foods will continue to survive, but it's hard to say what type of impact it will have on the company's reputation.

Is it eating the world?

It's no secret that the retail industry has suffered huge collateral damage from Amazon's meteoric rise. While its advantage is questionable, its influence is starting to permeate the mainstream media. For example, Walmart has adopted Amazon's model, which is questionable from a sustainability point of view. Regardless, it is important to note that Amazon is not alone in causing major collateral damage to retailers. Many other retailers have replicated its model.